Eunice starts off her introduction very nicely speaking in a tone that the reader can relate to, but the 2nd have of her intro begins to weaken. Once again and again, the thesis just states the writers tactic of representing characters and how it affects our perspective, but does not reveal a motive or something more specific to justify this method. This is most noticeable in the conclusion where the reader expects maybe some clarity, but is fed the same vague analysis again.
No comments:
Post a Comment